Burger King Employee Kills 67 Yr. Old Man

[FilmGal]

The coroner ruled it a homicide, but according to reports, the 67 yr. old swung at the employee first:

http://www.detnews.com/article/20101...eath-of-senior

[Adam Rebelius]

You sure it was the employee, and not the food?

[FilmGal]

Originally Posted by Adam Rebelius

You sure it was the employee, and not the food?

Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference.

[Adam Rebelius]

If they named their burgers after people on the bench, do you think it be "The Home of the Wapner"?

Put up yer dukes ya young whippersnapper! On second thought I could use a nap right now. Beating down an old guy ain't too cool, but forgetting how old you are and swinging on a 20 year old ain't too good either. That kid will probably do a year and some probation for going too far with the old dude.

[FilmGal]

Originally Posted by Adam Rebelius

If they named their burgers after people on the bench, do you think it be "The Home of the Wapner"?

Can I get a side of Scalia fries and a Sotomayer shake with that?

They'll probably fire the employee since the old dude didn't get to 'Have it his way'....Unless that's how he wanted it?

so i read ths man had pre existing heart condition, is at a FUCKING BURGER KING, and can find something at a burger king worth FIGHTING over with his 67 yr old ailing ass. stupid is as stupid does.

[peterbright]

Justifiable homicide actually.

[Jersey Jake]

Originally Posted by peterbright

Justifiable homicide actually.

that really depends. If the young man used unreasonable level of force after the old man was unable to continue the fight, then he has comitted a crime. This is a possibility, so I guess its best to let those with more facts and details be the judge.

I think anything more than manslaughter due to the fact the suspect was not the belligerent party would be excessive.