View Full Version : rampage jackson
05-29-2007, 02:26 PM
kicks chuck liddels ass
05-30-2007, 09:26 AM
I knew he would........... anyone who knows anything about MMA knew that would happen!
06-01-2007, 04:31 PM
hes also 10 years younger
06-01-2007, 06:59 PM
yes, he is 10 years younger.... that does mean a lot. He was older than some others as well and kicked their ass. I think Rampage is just better
06-07-2007, 04:25 AM
The fact that Rampage is 10 years younger means nothing when you are fighting a standup fighter like Chuck Liddel. Liddel is a clumsy striker and Rampage is a master in the art of takedowns. It was an easy bet.
07-28-2007, 02:09 AM
chuck lidell is a master on take down defence.and you idiot it was not the take down that won the fight.so therefore you make no sence joe go blow yourself. chuck has more wrestling experience then rampage.
07-28-2007, 02:50 AM
You know sometimes people just have your number. It happens in boxing all the time. Rampage just has chuck's number. That's how it goes sometimes. I think chuck is an amazing fighter and love to see people get there ass beat by chucks wierd throwing stance.
07-28-2007, 03:30 AM
thats the first intelligent post ive read.well done.
09-09-2007, 05:04 AM
I picked Rampage on this fight and I was correct. I was a bit worried but I have seen Henderson lose to larger guys in the past and he just gets tired. Rampage is the real deal and I am sure we will see a lot more action with him as the champ.
I think Henderson is good at 205 lbs but I think he should go down where he belongs @ 185. He would tear that division up!
Still, the fight last night was great and Henderson did a good job against Rampage, but he is still the champ at 205 lbs.
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.